BOARD MONITORING COMMITTE: SCORE SHEET (9th-16th of November)

Press Org	Total Score 51 +30	Comments	Press Org	Total Score	Comments
Indy Press	Total Score 51 +30	Grammatical errors in interview, nice poetry, rich features, entertainment not fully represented	Geo Press
Tech Press	54+30	Good design, covered all areas	MHPO	40+30	Beautiful editorial. Layout was not too good. No arts no entertainment. The sports was restricted to Football.
Zik Press	38+10	a distracting board with so many contrasting handwritings and also too many errors that were not neatly corrected. Although, all categories except ‘arts’ were well represented.	THPO	21	Splendid Interview. Poor design and the board lacked originality. No local news, entertainment, sports, poems and cartoons
Ames Press	44	AMES press had a small board but they were able to efficiently utilize the board, nice design and layout.	FAtssa Press	50	Their layout was elegant, cool editorial. Some grammatical errors
Linsa Press			Eco-X Press	33	Their fonts were too tiny. Their board was distorted and the layout was poor. No art. No poetry.
CLA			Sociology Press	34	No art. No poetry. No local news. Design/layout was manageable.
ASES Press	38	ASES press covered all the sections perfectly. The artwork was both entertaining cum educating. There were however few grammatical errors in the poem and editorial. Design and layout wasn’t too bad however some pictures on the vox-pop section were dark and blurred	Pol.Sci Press	33	Few pictures, lots of grammatical errors, No vox pop/interview. No poetry. No art.
Awo Press	35	Scanty and unattractive board. It lacked “originality”- sports and arts were not represented.	Psy Press	31	there was no sports, no poetry and no entertainment and some grammatical errors. The layout and design was not too good. Overall, they tried.
Philosophy Press		Tiny headings on the articles and colour combination should be improved upon, impressive local news. All categories were represented.	Idia Press	46.5+30	Nice design and layout, editorial poorly punctuated. Sports was sparsely represented. Arts was cool and funny. Local news was also sparsely represented.
Nursing		the editorial, entertainment and vox pop/interview categories were not represented. Only one item on local news.	P.P.O	24	Good maximisation of board, fairly layout design, little variety in sports, no poetry and arts. The editorial was really watery.
Assan		NO PUBLICATION	Nazpo
AVMS		NO PUBLICATION	Asson Press	27	Grammatical errors in the editorial, editorial lacked cohesion, poor design layout, no variety in sports, limited use of pictures, board was unattractive except for the magnificent artwork.
PAGE	33	The layout wasn’t that bad. No poetry, no sport, few ‘grammatical’, improvised art/cartoons and few blank spaces	Law Press		NO PUBLICATION
Afas Press	46	Nice design, poor layout as articles were poorly arranged. nice sports and features	Queens press	21.5	Unattractive board, editorial not good enough. Good sports.
RESPO		Commendable layout, however there was no local news	Agro Press	49	Written article mixed with printed ones, black and white publication. Overall rich publication
Aces Press	35	ACES press could not cover much probably because their board was small.	VOM		NO PUBLICATION
Chem Press		NO PUBLICATION	Geology press	21	Unattractive board, poor design layout, drab sports. No representation of entertainment, local news, poetry, arts. Interview had little or no content. Good emphasis on geological discoveries and technology.
AIS			Adhikir	26	Sports, vox pop/interview, poetry and arts categories not represented. No picture graced the board at all except a smiley and a lot of grammatical errors, especially the editorial.
Larissa	23	A major hindrance may be due to board size. Editorial was a lifted poem. News and art were not represented. While the design layout wasn’t too great.	NAMS	15	Poor layout, grammatical errors, lots of items not represented like local news, entertainment, sports, interview and arts.looks like the articles are old.