BOARD MONITORING COMMITTE: SCORE SHEET (2nd-9th of November)

0
16
Press Org Total Score46+25=71 Comments Press Org Total Score Comments
Indy Press Editorial not good enough, well arranged articles and nice poetry. Geo Press 32 Absence of local news and originality. Half the publication dedicated to entertainment
Tech Press 46.5 +30=76.5 Lot of blank spaces, grammatical errors, personal pronouns in editorial, but good enough pub. MHPO 38.5+25 =63.5 Articles were crammed together. Excellent cartoon and entertainment.
Zik Press 40  Nice Publication. Still out of touch with technological trends, unimpressive editorial, grammatical errors. THPO 34 Need to work more on layout and cover all areas effectively.
Ames Press 35 Impressive layout, editorial not impressive, good sports, no entertainment, no arts. FAtssa Press 50 Great layout, empty spaces, grammatical errors.
Linsa Press 23 +30=53 Eco-X Press 36 Too bold watermark, nice design, good management of board.
CLA 45 Extensive local news coverage but vox pop/interview not represented Sociology Press 30 Many categories not covered.
ASES Press 29 Sparse board, extensive grammatical errors, unimpressive publication. Pol.Sci Press 40 Poor sports, no entertainment, poetry or arts.
Awo Press 42 + 10=52 Well arranged articles, nice graphics, grammatical errors. Psy Press 31 Design not good enough, blank spaces, great cartoon, personal pronouns in editorial.
NAPS Press 53 +30=83 All categories well represented. Excellent publication, nice cartoon, lack of borders. Queen Idia Press 48 +30=78 Nice layout, nice cartoon, writers should be encouraged to write opinions.
Nursing 21 No editorial, no local news, poor layout. P.P.O 33 They need a larger board. No vox pop/interview, poetry and arts. Nice coverage. Lack of dates
Assan NO PUBLICATION Nazpo
AVMS NO PUBLICATION Asson Press
PAGE 32.5+20=52.5 All categories were covered, but poorly. Unimpressive editorial, poor interview. Law Press 48 Nice design, covered all categories. Poor layout as all articles were lumped together.
Afas Press 39.2 Poor layout, nice entertainment, blank spaces. Big room for improvement. Queens press 31 Qualities of some of the articles were shallow, design needs improvement. Nice publication.
RESPO 46.5 + 30=76.5 All aspects were covered, compelling layout, local news not detailed. Agro Press 26 Unimpressive publication, empty spaces and poor layout and poor coverage.
Aces Press 29 Tiny board, design not good enough, narrow coverage, nice cartoon and poem. VOM 35 All categories covered, nice editorial. Poor design and layout.
Chem Press 33 Covered all areas, lots of blank spaces, no entertainment, local news or arts. Geology press 18 Several categories missing. They need to step up their game
AIS 30 Adhikir 19 Empty spaces, lots of poem, no editorial.

 

WEEKLY REPORT FROM THE BOARD MONITORING COMMITTEE

BEST PRESS

TOP PRESS ORGANIZATIONS

NAPS PRESS – 83

QUEEN IDIA PRESS – 78

RESPO – 76.5

TECH PRESS – 76.5