BOARD MONITORING COMMITTE: SCORE SHEET (WEEK 4)

0
210
Press Org Total Score46 Comments Press Org Total Score Comments
Indy Press They displayed journalistic prowess that was unique but had no poetry or art. Bello press 29 Half filled board, low local new, no vox pop
Tech Press 43+30(online)=73 Lot of blank spaces but good enough pub. MHPO 43+10(online)=53 Grammatical errors, well written editorial, limited variety in sports, no entertainment
Zik Press 37  Nice Publication. Still out of touch with technological trends THPO 29 Lacks enough pictures, limited variety in sports
Ames Press 33.5 No entertainment, Vox pop/Interview, Cartoon/Arts. Need improvement FAtssa Press 51.5 Well arranged board. No arts but generally impressive
Linsa Press 23 Plaigarised editorial, a lot of missing areas, and grammatical errors Eco-X Press 35.5 No arts, poetry, entertainment. Design not impressive
CLA 37 Extensive local news coverage but vox pop/interview not represented Sociology Press 34.5 Poor design/layout. No local news, poetry or arts
ASES Press 29.5 Sparse board, extensive grammatical errors Pol.Sci Press 40 Poor sports, no entertainment, poetry or arts.
Ates Press 22 Not enough coverage of areas. Scope is too narrow. Psy Press 37 Editorial was a person’s article with a pen name. not impressive at all
Philosophy Press 54 +30(online)=84 All categories well represented. Excellent publication. Fassa 40 Great publication but missing entertainment, local news, poetry and arts
Nursing 38 No entertainment, sports or local news. Not enough to catch interest. P.P.O 26 They need a larger board. No vox pop/interview, poetry and arts.
Assan 14 Very scanty board. Poorly arranged articles and not enough publication Nazpo 10 Scanty board, very narrow scope and almost all areas were missing.
AVMS 21 Lots of grammatical error, scanty board and not enough coverage of areas Asson Press 21 Scanty board, No local news, sports and arts
PAGE 16 Not much articles of interest. Poor coverage. Law Press 44
Afas Press 42.5 Poetry and Arts absent. Entertainment not up to date and. Editorial not so impressive NUESA press 45
RESPO 43 +30(online)=73 All aspects were covered but not effectively. Brilliant editorial Adult Ed Press 35
Classics Press 40 Great Publication. Great potential. VOM 39
Kuti 29.5 A lot of grammatical errors, unattractive board and no pictures Awo PressQIP 4249+30=79

WEEKLY REPORT FROM THE BOARD MONITORING COMMITTEE

TOP PRESS ORGANIZATIONS

NAPS PRESS – 84

QUEEN IDIA PRESS – 79

RESPO – 73

TECH PRESS – 73

 

 

 

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here